* * *
There was a bit of dust-up amongst the "elite" birders in our home town recently on the subject of "predator control," and about the division of the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service known as Wildlife Services.
The hub-bub all started with an article
written by Rob Davis in the "Voice of San Diego." (The Voice of San Diego
says it is a "member-based nonprofit investigative news organization that
gives concerned citizens the tools they need to engage in important
conversations about their community.")
A number of highly-esteemed local
birders have stepped up to defend Wildlife Services. The fact is, however, that Mr. Davis is by no means alone in
expressing concerns about this very active, but little-known federal agency.
The Sacramento Bee earlier this year published a three-part report by
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Tom Knudson. And the SacBee also
doesn’t paint a pretty picture of a benign federal agency staffed exclusively
by conscientious wildlife managers.
The Natural
Resources Defense Council, while recognizing that much of the work of
Wildlife Services does benefit the public, has also come out strongly in favor
of reforming the Wildlife Service predator control program.
Oregon Public Radio's "Thinking
Out Loud" has also just done an interesting show on the subject with
representatives from Predator Defense and the ranching industry.
Finally, two U.S congressmen – one
a Republican, the other a Democrat (to preclude those shrill cries of
partisanship) – are calling for a congressional
investigation of the federal government's wildlife damage control
program. "We have an agency that appears to be wasting federal
dollars and actually causing harm while doing it, but yet perhaps covering up
what they are doing and why. That's something Congress should
investigate," Rep. John Campbell (R-Irvine) has said.
No comments:
Post a Comment