UPDATE 26-Jan-2016:
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uKsBjWv2CnDhCmxrEDqrx5LFg4a5r5zVNtd8nwocCgeMJHObQ0IivLHgN6EPMfOuVj_iyi6i7vKpNm5LEZ1IAEzl3sqXc_2445Rgv90EoQg8WgdJj-YUUbQBgx3jrPvGZxnaa4rbLThzX4JtfygCmrNy7DpIPRQD3zSNph9bU=s0-d)
From top left, booking photographs of Ammon Bundy, Ryan Bundy, Brian Cavalier and Shawna Cox. From bottom left, Ryan Waylen Payne, Joseph Donald O’Shaughnessy and Peter Santilli.
Credit
Multnomah County Sheriff
Ammon and Ryan Bundy, and three of their merry misfits -- Shawna Cox of Utah, Ryan Waylen Payne of Montana, and Brian Cavalier of Nevada -- were arrested today at in a traffic stop in Harney County.
Another miscreant -- reported to be LaVoy Finicum who had emerged as de facto spokesman for these criminals -- was killed when shots were reportedly exchanged.
Peter Santilli of Cincinnati, and Joseph Donald O’Shaughnessy of Cottonwood, Arizona, were arrested later in Burns.
Remote coward John Eric Ritzheimer turned himself in to police in Peoria, Arizona. The Oregonian reports that Ritzheimer, 32, a "key militant leader," rose to fame complaining on a video about the delivery of dildos to the refuge in response to pleas for supplies.
Remote coward John Eric Ritzheimer turned himself in to police in Peoria, Arizona. The Oregonian reports that Ritzheimer, 32, a "key militant leader," rose to fame complaining on a video about the delivery of dildos to the refuge in response to pleas for supplies.
Absurdly, the group was reportedly on their way to yet another off-site press opportunity about 70 miles away in John Day, Oregon. Local media reports that roadblocks had finally been set up to limit access to the occupied wildlife refuge.
I'd like to believe these assholes went out in a final blaze of stupidity -- exercising their rights as "sovereign citizens" to use public highways that they feel no obligation to help pay for.
The Times reports that these nitwits face a federal felony charge of
conspiracy to impede federal officers from discharging
their official duties through the use of force, intimidation or threats. But I could come up with a dozen or more additional charges if the U.S. Attorney needs help. Call me!
It'll be interesting now to see if the federal government that Ammon Bundy and crew don't "believe in," will have the cajones to prosecute these fools and put them away for a long, long time.
Now it's time to clean out the rest of the rat's nest at Malheur and call in the CSI and refuge folks to figure out just how much economic damage these fools can be charged for.
Now it's time to clean out the rest of the rat's nest at Malheur and call in the CSI and refuge folks to figure out just how much economic damage these fools can be charged for.
UPDATE 13-Jan-2016:
Nancy Langston, a professor of environmental history at Michigan Technological University, has a great op-ed in the NY Times that walks us through the difficult history of Malheur NWR. Her conclusion:
When mythic histories supplant the complexities of the past, the results can be lethal. Equitable futures for Western public lands won’t be achieved when ideologues swagger in, brandishing guns and taking over federal buildings. Rather, they develop from the hard work of collaboration, like the 2013 effort that brought together the local community, tribes, conservation groups and the state and federal governments to develop a new management plan for Malheur. These are the efforts that best respect the region’s history while pointing the way to a sustainable future.Meanwhile, we sincerely hope Billy Williams, the U.S. Attorney for Oregon, is working on indictments for Ammon Bundy and all the other 20-odd fools staffing the barricades in Voltage-Princeton. These people should be going away for a very long time, and should also be forced to reimburse taxpayers for economic losses -- including the $100,000+ per week in salaries their tomfoolery is costing us.
But we're not holding our breath about that either. As pointed out by the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), the armed seizure of Malheur National Wildlife Refuge was a foreseeable outcome of the utter lack of a coherent response to earlier confrontations with anti-government extremists. A July 2014 Homeland Security assessment entitled “Domestic Violent Extremists Pose Increased Threat to Government Officials and Law Enforcement” supports that view, correctly predicting that the “perceived victory” of the Bundy stand-off with BLM in Nevada “is galvanizing some individuals – particularly militia extremists and violent lone offenders – to actively confront law enforcement officials, increasing the likelihood of violence.” The DHS assessment went on to link the murder of two Las Vegas police officers to this ongoing policy failure.
UPDATE 11-Jan-2016:
Unlike the Bundy-type legally futile efforts to hand federal and back to the "original owners" (which, again, we assume does not mean the Paiute tribes), the New York Times reports on an effort that could achieve real results ... especially if a Republican or Republican-type takes the White House in 2017.
One of the well-heeled lobbying groups leading this charge is the American Lands Council, and Utah-based group funded by donations from county governments, and by Americans for Prosperity (the group backed by the billionaire Koch brothers).
The American Lands Council is a non-profit organization founded in 2012. Their mission is to "secure local control of western public lands by transferring federal public lands to willing States."
Sound great, right? The only problem I can see, based on my years in government service, is that the morning after this hoped-for transfer occurred, states – and primarily their county political subdivisions – would find themselves responsible for environmental management, law enforcement, fire protection, and a host of other jobs federal agencies now do. And there'd be no additional money in state coffers to cover any of these costs. It would be the classic case of being 'land-poor'.
It doesn't take a lot of imagination to figure out what would happen next. The states and counties would quickly move to sell off their newly-gained lands to raise money. The pretext would be to raise money to pay for managing all these lands. But the temptation would be extreme to also use the money to lower or eliminate other taxes – which would of course appeal greatly to the same teabagger types.
So who would have the ready cash to bid at auction for these former federal lands? Transnational corporations. The Koch brothers, and their one-percenter country club pals. Chinese and Russian Mafia billionaires. In other words, the same people who currently own most of everything in this country except for those much-coveted, resource rich federal lands.
Long story short, if you live in the American West, and if you've always taken for granted access to millions of acres of public lands for hunting, fishing, camping, hiking, birding, etc. – well, prepare for a whole new reality if lobbyists like the American Lands Council get their way. Within a generation, it'll all be gone. These lands will lie behind gates with big "No Trespassing" signs.
UPDATE:
As of 06 January 2016, we're hearing that Ammon Bundy and his misguided stooges will go home as soon as all federal land is "returned" to ranchers and state governments.
Sadly, this simple-sounding idea speaks volumes about the ignorance of these poor saps. The federal lands can't be "returned," because in the case of almost all Public Lands, these lands have been owned by the 'sovereign' (first the king, then the U.S. federal government) from the moment the first white man stumbled ashore and planted a European flag. If you doubt that's true, just ask any Indian tribe -- including the Northern Paiute whose land Malheur NWR and the rest of Harney County once was -- whose land ownership was stripped away by the federal government under the so-called Papal Doctrine of Discovery.
Long story short, if it never belonged to you, it can't be "returned" to you. Right?
Any land in the U.S. now owned by a state, county, city, corporation, individual, or Chinese billionaire, was at some point in the past 'patented' out of federal ownership by the General Land Office or BLM under authority of some federal law or another (e.g., homestead laws, donation land acts, statehood organic acts, etc.).
That said, we here at BAVOB don't condone the growing demands for these protesters' blood. (Search Twitter for “Oregon” and “drone strike” and you'll find tons of people proposing to give the Malheur activists the Abdulrahman Awlaki treatment. TV host Montel Williams tweeted that the authorities should “put this down using National Guard with shoot to kill orders.” “I hope they pull a M.O.V.E. on those terrorists in Oregon,” wrote the author Jess Nevins, alluding to a black militant group whose Philadelphia headquarters were bombed by the police in 1985, killing 11 people and destroying dozens of homes.)
No, these guys aren't terrorists in the sense of ISIS or Al Qaeda. They're just really poorly misinformed by the faux-lawyer leaders of this crackpot "movement" like the Bundys ... uber-crackpots who seem to have spun this crazy idea into another full-fledged family cottage industry.
And that just seems to call for better education and more collaborative federal land use policies, not for execution by drone strike.
***
You all know I respect anyone’s right to get thoroughly moosed up over just about anything … even if they clearly have no idea what they’re talking about. But I draw the line when they seize public property, and when they take to disrupting and endangering people’s lives like these “Sovereign Citizen” jackasses are doing out east in Harney County, Oregon.
As amateur ornithologists who
have birded and supported Malheur National Wildlife
Refuge, we also have a personal dog in this fight. So I'm taking the gloves off.
* * *
As a bit of background, Malheur National Wildlife
Refuge was established in 1908 by President Theodore Roosevelt – hardly a raving
socialist in anyone’s book – by setting aside “unclaimed government lands” as a
“preserve and breeding ground for native birds.” (Let’s skip for now the fact that this land
had actually been “claimed” by the Northern Paiute tribes since time immemorial, that
Malheur was once part of a “permanent” 1,778,560-acre reservation guaranteed
eastern Oregon’s “wandering” Indians in 1872, and that the reservation was stripped away from
the Paiute less than four years later at the demand of local stockmen and
ranchers who thought all that scrubland was being wasted on “savages.”)
Malheur National Wildlife
Refuge was the 19th in a line of 51 unique
and irreplaceable national wildlife refuges created by Teddy Roosevelt during
his presidency. I guess executive
action is only categorically evil if committed by a black Democrat? But again, I digress.
And what an amazing place Malheur is, being a crucial stop along the Pacific Flyway that offers resting, breeding, and
nesting habitat for millions of migratory birds, as well as habitat for local
flora and fauna.
Nor would this important wildlife resource likely exist today without federal efforts. As the Great Depression roiled the nation, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt created the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) in 1933. With the
purchase (not condemnation) of the Blitzen Valley portion of the Eastern Oregon Land and
Livestock Company holdings, the Malheur Refuge became an ideal location for CCC
people and projects that improved the refuge and supported local businesses through the worst years of the Great Depression with the ongoing purchase of vast quantities of food, fuel, construction materials, and related provender.
Allow me to anticipate the rebuttal here: that just like they've been harassing the poor Hammond family (who didn't arrive on the scene until 1964, and who knew full well they were buying their small ranch right next door to an operating wildlife refuge), the feds must have intentionally driven Eastern Oregon Land and
Livestock Company out of business in 1933 so the evil feds could grab their land for their nefarious purposes. Maybe as a secret landing field for black UN helicopters that the feds secretly knew would be invented in a few decades? Well, since American national politics during the decade leading up to the Great Depression were dominated by the Republican
Party, which controlled both the White House and Congress right up through the 1932 election, it's pretty tough to maintain that proposition. But I'm sure some will!
Anyhow, where were we? Oh yeah – with Ammon Bundy and 100-150 other thugs occupying the public's CCC-built refuge headquarters. Which is costing us all thousands of dollars daily as Burns area federal employees sit home out of concerns for their personal safety.
Now, I’m not surprised Ammon Bundy can’t
articulate what his group of trespassers actually hopes to achieve. When asked what it would take for the
protesters to leave the refuge headquarters, Bundy reportedly replied: “The
people will need to be able to use the land and resources without fear as free
men and women. We know it will take some
time.”
Alrighty then … clear as mud!
Alrighty then … clear as mud!
And I’m not surprised because, having waded through thickets of hair-brained rhetoric in an effort to understand what the entire “Sagebrush
Rebellion” gang wants … well, I still have no clear idea. And it sure ain’t for lack of trying on my
part.
Best as I can tell, however, what it all seems to boil down to is a legal theory – I'll dignify it with that label – that the intent of the nation's founders and 225 years of constitutional jurisprudence aside, we’ve
got it all wrong about the federal government.
In a nutshell, these well-meaning folks don't believe in the existence of a federal government with authority to own and manage land, or
to enforce laws. Speaking to radio
host Dana Loesch, Cliven Bundy once said he believes in a “sovereign state of Nevada,”
but that he doesn’t “recognize the United States government as even existing.” Where did they come up with such an idea? No idea.
Flowing from this hogwash, Cliven Bundy’s refusal to pay upwards of $1
Million in BLM grazing fees and fines in Nevada is very loosely grounded in
Bundy’s notion that the land around his 160-acre Nevada ranchette belongs to
the state of Nevada, not to the federal government. Never mind that the State of Nevada itself lays
no such claim to that land!
No word on the Bundy family's stance on Santa Claus.
* * *
While no one would accuse the BLM of being some
kind of environmental angel, the so-called “Sagebrush Rebellion” seems to be a reaction to significant federal land-use policy changes in the 1970s as a more environmentally-oriented
federal government began imposing use regulations on its vast holdings in the
West. This policy sea-change was
based in laws like the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) – referred to
by some as America’s “environmental Magna Carta” – that was signed into law in
1970 by none other than that liberal political firebrand, President Richard M.
Nixon. Still, many westerners chose to point
the blame instead at President Jimmy Carter, who they accused of using Nixon’s
environmental laws to target states that didn’t support Carter’s presidential
run. Okay. Maybe.
So how did we get here from there?
Near as I can tell, all this “Sovereign Citizen”
thinking comes from people talking exclusively to other folks who look and think
exactly like you do and from otherwise ignoring, you know, ‘reality’. Which always tends to cause problems.
The one thing I do know is that if these corn-pone
intellectuals like Cliven Bundy could have an audience with this country’s
founders … well, they’d be laughed right out of the room. Because if there was one thing America’s
founders universally shared, it was a healthy fear of and disdain for an ill-informed,
hyper-excited, well-armed rabble like these f-tards now occupying Malheur.
That’s why the founders included the term “well
regulated Militia” in the Second Amendment – their idea of “well regulated”
being leadership by landed and educated “gentlemen” who knew precisely what
time it was.
And it’s why the founders separated the rabble –
i.e., you and me! – from direct election of the President (think ‘Electoral
College’), the Senate (up until the Seventeenth Amendment, ratified in 1913, U.S.
senators were elected by state legislatures), and Supreme Court justices (while
many states elect even their highest judicial officers, our sage founders chose
instead to have ALL federal judges appointed by the indirectly elected
president, and confirmed by the indirectly elected senate.)
While we’re on the subject, let’s also clear up
this business of a ‘non-existent’ federal government. That too would shock and awe any Founding Father presented with such a crazy notion.
Because that was a main point of the U.S. Constitution. As soon as the American colonists
had struggled free of King George III, the first thing they tried to do was
establish their own strong national government.
And they kept trying until it finally "took" in 1789.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but the modern so-called Tea Party movement is on
no better footing than the Sagebrush "rebels." America’s founders
weren’t against government, and they weren’t against taxes. They were just dead-set against
non-representative government (which they considered “tyranny”), and they were dead-set against
“taxation without representation” (which was the sole reason for the Boston Tea
Party of December 1773). Otherwise, the
founders knew full-well that there were some things that could only be done by
a strong central government, and they devoted themselves to creating one of those from
the earliest days of the American republic.
Sorry Cliven. Sorry Ammon. You’re both on the wrong side of history.
* * *
That said, is there any real oppression going on
in this country? Oh, you bet there
is!
But it’s not orchestrated oppression by wildlife refuge
civil servants trying to improve and protect habitat for migrating ducks and
geese. And it’s not by BLM range
managers charged working to ensure that private users of the public domain (like
Cliven Bundy) pay for what they use, and that their cattle don’t destroy the
public’s range lands in the process.
No, the real oppressors of today are the so-called
one-percenter mega-rich (both Americans and foreigners) who control America’s
tax codes, property laws, and land use regulations through their wildly
disproportionate influence over the political process through paid lobbying and
virtually unregulated campaign finance.
The true oppressors of today are also the
mega-corporations (both Americans and foreign) which collect any small tax
burden they pay from us, their customers, as part of their product or service pricing structure.
And which collect what amounts to an "existence tax" from all of us, daily, through legally-sanctioned
monopolistic practices that allow these transnational corporations to set and maintain the prices we all
pay for the necessities and amenities of modern life: food, fuel, shelter, clothing, health care,
education, internet access, and virtually everything else our paychecks or
pensions go towards.
Still, as long as these real and true oppressors
of the people can keep us common working stiffs distracted – by trumped up fights between Republicans and Democrats, Blacks and Whites and Mexicans, Christians and Atheists, Hippies and Patriots, Sovereign Citizens and Federal employees – then won’t any of us have the
time or energy to think about them. And
that’s all the true oppressors really need to keep on keeping on, right?